Weak or fragmented governance. Different activities can fall under different institutions, agreements and jurisdictions, making coordinated ecosystem management difficult.
Insufficient enforcement. Environmental rules have limited value when governments lack the resources, monitoring systems or political capacity required to enforce them.
Illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. IUU fishing can undermine fisheries management, threaten marine ecosystems and disadvantage fishers operating legally.
Protected areas with insufficient protection. Some designated marine protected areas allow significant extractive or damaging activities, limiting their conservation benefits.
Activities outside protected boundaries. Migratory species and ecological processes do not stop at lines drawn on maps. Pollution, fishing and climate change outside protected areas can still affect ecosystems within them.
Climate change. Species distributions and habitats are shifting as the ocean warms, meaning conservation boundaries designed around historical conditions may need to adapt.
Unequal capacity between countries. Effective ocean monitoring, research and enforcement require technology, expertise and financing that are not equally available worldwide.
Competing uses of ocean space. Fishing, shipping, tourism, conservation, renewable energy, resource extraction and other activities can create conflicts over how marine areas should be used.
Effective governance therefore requires more than creating rules. It requires cooperation, scientific evidence, transparency, resources and long-term implementation.